Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1722•Paul Lewis v. Hp/eds, (hewlett-Packard) Electronic Data Systems; Bank of America
09-1722Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.03.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1722
PAUL LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HP/EDS, (HEWLETT-PACKARD) ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS; BANK OF
AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00628-RAJ-JEB)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Anne Scully, BAKER &
HOSTETLER, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Paul Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying
relief in his employment discrimination action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lewis
v. HP/EDS, (Hewlett-Packard) Elec. Data Sys., No. 2:08-cv-00628-
RAJ-JEB (E.D. Va. May 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.