Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1607•Harald Schmidt v. Citibank (south Dakota) N.a.
09-1607Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.03.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1607
HARALD SCHMIDT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:08-cv-00165-JCC-JFA)
Submitted: February 8, 2010 Decided: March 9, 2010
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harald Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Metcoff Klaus,
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harald Schmidt appeals the district court’s order,
inter alia, confirming an arbitration award and awarding
attorneys’ fees and expenses in favor of Citibank (South
Dakota) N.A. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Schmidt v. Citibank, No. 1:08-cv-00165-JCC-JFA
(E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.