Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1530•Getsie Kiruba Diamond v. Bon Secours Hospital
09-1530Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.03.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1530
GETSIE KIRUBA DIAMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BON SECOURS HOSPITAL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:07-cv-02901-WDQ)
Submitted: February 22, 2010 Decided: March 9, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Getsie Kiruba Diamond, Appellant Pro Se. Darren M. Creasy,
Sidney R. Steinberg, POST & SCHELL, PC, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Getsie Kiruba Diamond appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer
in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Diamond v. Bon
Secours Hosp., No. 1:07-cv-02901-WDQ (D. Md. Apr. 14, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.