Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1463•Thomas Wane Marett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
09-1463Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.10.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1463
THOMAS WANE MARETT,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Court No. 06-
4048)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 2, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Wane Marett, Appellant Pro Se. John DiCicco, Richard
Farber, Andrew Weiner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C.; Clarissa C. Potter, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Wane Marett appeals from the tax court’s orders
imposing sanctions, upholding the Commissioner’s proposed
collection activities with respect to his tax liability for the
2000 tax year, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court.
See Marett v. Comm’r, IRS, Tax Ct. No. 06-4048 (U.S.T.C. Jan 22,
2009; entered Feb. 25 & filed Feb. 26, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.