Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1206•Edward E. Stroupe, Jr. v. Michael J. Astrue
09-1206Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.12.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1206
EDWARD E. STROUPE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00090-jpj-pms)
Submitted: November 24, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Shawn C. Carver,
Robert W. Kosman, Assistant Regional Counsel, Taryn F. Jasner,
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social
Security that Stroupe was not entitled to supplemental security
income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Stroupe v. Astrue, No. 1:07-cv-00090-jpj-
pms (W.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.