Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1137•Iftikhar H. Saiyed v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car
09-1137Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.08.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1137
IFTIKHAR H. SAIYED,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:08-cv-01147-JCC-JFA)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Iftikhar H. Saiyed, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, ISLER,
DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Iftikhar H. Saiyed appeals the district court’s order
denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss and granting Defendant’s
summary judgment motion on his race discrimination and
retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
Saiyed v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car, No. 1:08-cv-01147-JCC-JFA (E.D.
Va. Jan. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.