Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1084•Renee R. Berry v. GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce
09-1084Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.08.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1084
RENEE R. BERRY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:08-cv-00459-JCC-TRJ)
Submitted: July 27, 2009 Decided: August 17, 2009
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Renee R. Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Renee R. Berry appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss and dismissing her
civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Berry v. Locke, No. 1:08-cv-00459-JCC-
TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.