Jilla N. Vanover, Rn, Bsn, Ba v. Alan Shams

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1016
JILLA N. VANOVER, RN, BSN, BA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ANGELTOUCH HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALAN SHAMS; CYNTHIA SHAMS; CHARLES JAMES SWEDISH, Attorney
at Law; BANK OF NEW YORK; SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC; ADAMS WHITE;
ERIC WHITE; J. SILVER, Mr.; R. LUECK, Mr., Revenue Officer,
AGM; MR. CONTE, Collector; DEBORAH C. STANLEY, Ms.,
Associate Area Council in Richmond; MICHAEL LENIHAM, Mr.
Technical Service Advisory Group Manager; MRS. HANA,
Auditor; MRS. CARR, Supervisor of Auditors; FATEMEH
NAJAFIAN, Ms., MD; THOMAS KIM, Mr., Special Agent, Special
Inquiries and Intelligence Division, Department of Treasury,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:08-cv-01037-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

Jilla N. Vanover, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Todd Freeman,
SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Ronald James Guillot,
Jr., SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Jonathan S.
Cohen, Christine Durney Mason, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Robert K. Coulter, Assistant United
States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jilla N. Vanover appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Vanover v. Shams, No. 1:08-cv-01037-LMB-
IDD (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 23, 2008 & entered Oct. 23, 2008;
Oct. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --