Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-8547•United States of America v. Darren L. Keys
08-8547Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.08.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8547
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARREN L. KEYS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:98-cr-00144-CCB-1)
Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darren L. Keys, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Ellis Eisenberg,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darren L. Keys appeals the district court’s marginal
order denying his “Motion for Specific Performance of Plea
Agreement.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. To the extent Keys seeks to
again contest his 2003 criminal conviction, he would first need
to obtain authorization from this court to file a successive 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2244(a) (2006); 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(h). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.