Kenneth Edward Barbour v. WESTERN REGIONAL DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of Corrections

08-8544Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.05.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8544
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WESTERN REGIONAL DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of
Corrections; WARDEN, W.R.S.P; B. J. RAVIZEE; M. SHORT,
Lieutenant; BRYAN WATSON; LIEUTENANT BUGIN; S. COLLINS,
Correctional Officer; MAJOR COMBS; DOCTOR LEE; R. M.
GARNERT; M. STANFORD, R.N.; R. BIVENS, Regional Ombudsman,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:08-cv-00598-JCT-MFU)
Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: May 19, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Edward Barbour, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Edward Barbour appeals the district court’s
order consolidating his eight 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints
and dismissing them without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. Barbour v. Western Reg’l Dir., No. 7:08-cv-00598-JCT-MFU
(W.D. Va. Nov. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.