Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-8463•United States of America v. DEMOND O’NEIL PARKER, a/k/a Neil
08-8463Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.06.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8463
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEMOND O’NEIL PARKER, a/k/a Neil,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-9)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 4, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demond O’Neil Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Demond O’Neil Parker appeals the district court’s
order granting his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Parker’s motions to:
vacate the district court’s order, appoint counsel, and remand
the case, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Parker, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-9 (W.D.
Va. Oct. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.