Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-8445•United States of America v. Michael R. Ray
08-8445Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.05.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8445
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL R. RAY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:02-cr-00687-TLW-1)
Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: May 13, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael R. Ray, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael R. Ray appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motions to amend his restitution order and for
reconsideration of the district court’s denial of his motion to
amend his restitution order. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s orders. United States v. Ray, No. 4:02-cr-00687-TLW-1
(D.S.C. Apr. 22, 2008; Nov. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.