Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-8412•Robert H. Dixon v. R. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Mountain View Correctional Institution
08-8412Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.03.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8412
ROBERT H. DIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Mountain View
Correctional Institution; NURSE PRESNELL, RN, Mountain View
Correctional Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00473-GCM)
Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert H. Dixon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert H. Dixon appeals the district court’s order
denying him leave to file an amended complaint after the action
had already been dismissed. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Dixon v. Mitchell, No.
1:08-cv-00473-GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.