United States of America v. David Boynton

08-8322Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.02.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8322
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID BOYNTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:97-cr-00294-JRS-1)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Amy Leigh
Austin, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Assistant Federal
Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard
Daniel Cooke, Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David Boynton appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.
Boynton, No. 3:97-cr-00294-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 2008). See
United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.