Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-8206•Antonio Saunders v. BUCKNER, Corrections Officer
08-8206Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.10.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8206
ANTONIO SAUNDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BUCKNER, Corrections Officer; K. CLAY, Master Jail Officer;
BUDD, Officer; BYNUM, Master Jail Officer; G. EDWARDS,
Officer; SIMMONS, Officer; S. WILKINS, Sgt.; A. ESMILLER,
Master Jail Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00501-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 28, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville,
NORRIS, ST. CLAIR & LOTKIN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Saunders appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Saunders v. Buckner, No. 1:07-cv-00501-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va.
filed Aug. 28, 2008; entered Sept. 2, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.