Danny Russell Redden v. HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General

08-8190Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.02.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8190
DANNY RUSSELL REDDEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General; S. PRENTISS COUNTS,
Assistant Attorney General; DEBORAH RJ SHUPE, Assistant
Attorney General; JOHN DOE, Horry County Solicitor's Office;
HAROLD W. GOWDY, III, Solicitor Seventh Judicial Circuit;
MARK MORIN, Assistant Solicitor Cherokee County,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (8:08-cv-02845-CMC)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Russell Redden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Danny Russell Redden appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Redden v. McMaster, No. 8:08-cv-02845-CMC
(D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.