Chetanand Kumar Sewraz v. EDWARD GUICE, Lieutenant

08-8173Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.03.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8173
CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDWARD GUICE, Lieutenant; SCOTT BAILEY, Detective; KATHERINE
ATKINS, Evidence Technician; DARRIN EDWARD BROMSETH,
Detective; CRAIG BROWN, Detective; JODY BRUNNER, Detective;
JUANAMETTRE BUTLER, Officer; FRANK CARPENTER; JESSICA
CHAMER, Evidence Technician,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00035-RLW)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chetanand Kumar Sewraz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Chetanand Kumar Sewraz appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Sewraz v. Guice, No. 3:08-cv-00035-RLW (E.D.
Va. Aug. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.