Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-8020•Ralph J. Curry v. WARDEN; FRANK TOSTON, Officer
08-8020Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.02.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8020
RALPH J. CURRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN; FRANK TOSTON, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District
Judge. (1:08-cv-00151-BEL)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ralph J. Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Nilsson, GOODELL
DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; John Francis
Breads, Jr., Matthew Douglas Peter, Hanover, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ralph J. Curry appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Curry v. Warden, No. 1:08-cv-00151-BEL (D. Md. filed
Sept. 5, 2008 & entered Sept. 8, 2008). We deny Curry’s motion
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.