United States of America v. Jamal Mitchell, a/k/a Boo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7944
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:02-cr-00025-JCC-1)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for the return of property, pursuant to Fed.
R. Crim. P. 41(g). We review the denial of a Rule 41(g) motion
for return of property for an abuse of discretion. United
States v. Chambers, 192 F.3d 374, 376 (3d Cir. 1999). We have
reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion.
Accordingly, we deny Mitchell’s motion for substantive relief
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Mitchell, No. 1:02-cr-00025-JCC-1 (E.D. Va.
Aug. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --