Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-7725•Claude Carpenter v. C.T. WOODY, Sheriff
08-7725Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.04.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7725
CLAUDE CARPENTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C.T. WOODY, Sheriff; BURNETT, Lt. Col.; ROBINSON, Capt.,
Medical Dept.; DR. FURMAN; RICHMOND SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00143-RLW)
Submitted: March 31, 2009 Decided: April 14, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claude Carpenter, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, Thomas
Douglas Lane, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Claude Carpenter appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Carpenter v. Woody, No. 3:08-cv-00143-
RLW (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.