Gregory Bryce Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office

08-7218Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.02.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7218
GREGORY BRYCE TANNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORDSTROM CORPORATE OFFICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00241-RAJ-FBS)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Bryce Tanner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Bryce Tanner appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate, No. 2:08-cv-00241-RAJ-FBS
(E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2008 & entered June 17, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.