Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-7069•United States of America v. Reginald Lamont Ussery
08-7069Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.12.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7069
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGINALD LAMONT USSERY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:94-cr-00095-F-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Lamont Ussery, Appellant Pro Se. Felice McConnell
Corpening, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Anne Margaret
Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of
his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Ussery, No. 5:94-cr-00095-F-1 (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.