Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-6989•United States of America v. Rohan St. Joseph Keating, a/k/a Charles Joe
08-6989Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.10.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6989
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROHAN ST. JOSEPH KEATING, a/k/a Charles Joe,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2)
Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rohan St. Joseph Keating, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Scott W. Putney,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rohan St. Joseph Keating appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Keating, No.
2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2008; entered May 7,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.