Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-6903•United States of America v. Jean Ronel Dor
08-6903Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.03.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6903
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEAN RONEL DOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 4, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg,
West Virginia, for Appellant. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Thomas
Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorneys, Martinsburg,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jean Ronel Dor appeals the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of
sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have
reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Dor, No. 3:04-cr-00067-
JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W. Va. May 28, 2008); see United States v.
Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir. 2009). We deny Dor’s motion
for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.