Jay Timothy Lurz v. JON P. GALLEY, Warden

08-6569Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.10.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6569
JAY TIMOTHY LURZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JON P. GALLEY, Warden; ISAIAS TESSEMA, M.D.; JUDITH LUPTON,
LPN; LT. D. WHITE, H.U.#2 Manager; BARBARA NEWLON, Med.
Man.; MRS. HUMBERTSON, Med. Director; MEDICAL STAFF,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge.
(1:07-cv-00072-AMD)
Submitted: September 29, 2008 Decided: October 9, 2008
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Timothy Lurz, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND; Philip Melton Andrews,
Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jay Timothy Lurz appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lurz
v. Galley, No. 1:07-cv-00072-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 6, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.