Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-6290•United States of America v. Al Malik Sharief Kareem Wright
08-6290Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.04.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6685
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AL MALIK SHARIEF KAREEM WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (7:92-cr-00408-GRA-1)
Submitted: October 31, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Al Malik Sharief Kareem Wright, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun
Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Al Malik Wright appeals from the district court’s
orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Wright, No. 7:92-cr-00408-GRA-1 (D.S.C.
Mar. 17 & Apr. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.