Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-6276•United States of America v. Owen Odman, a/k/a Charles Llewelyn
08-6276Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.04.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6528
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
OWEN ODMAN, a/k/a Charles Llewelyn,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (4:96-cr-00053-LHT-1; 1:04-cv-00044-LHT)
Submitted: October 15, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Owen Odman, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Owen Odman appeals the district court’s order granting
in part and denying in part relief from a pre-filing injunction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Odman, No. 4:96-cr-00053-LHT-1
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.