Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-6258•Billy Reid Trembley v. OFFICER DAVIS, Jail Officer; OFFICER WOODS, Jail Officer
08-6258Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.09.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6258
BILLY REID TREMBLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER DAVIS, Jail Officer; OFFICER WOODS, Jail Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00853-WO-WWD)
Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 16, 2008
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy Reid Trembley, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Edwin DeCicco,
TEMPLETON & RAYNOR, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Billy Reid Trembley appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Trembley v. Davis,
No. 1:07-cv-00853-WO-WWD (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2008). We deny
Appellees’ pending motion to dismiss and amended motion to dismiss
as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.