Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-6120•United States of America v. John Paul Smith
08-6120Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.03.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6953
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JOHN PAUL SMITH,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:02-cr-00064-JPB-7)
Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Paul Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Paul Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A.
§ 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See United States
v. Smith, No. 3:02-cr-00064-JPB-7 (N.D.W. Va. May 30, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.