Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-4465•United States of America v. Lesa R. Fuller
08-4465Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.11.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-4465
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LESA R. FULLER,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:07-cr-00234-1)
Submitted: October 23, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy N. Giatras, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM, PLLC, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States
Attorney, Susan M. Robinson, Assistant United States Attorney,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lesa R. Fuller pled guilty to embezzlement under 18
U.S.C. § 656 (2006) and was sentenced to twenty-one months of
imprisonment. On appeal, Fuller alleges that the district court
erred by enhancing her sentence by two levels for abusing a
position of trust under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
(“USSG”) § 3B1.3 (2007). For the reasons that follow, we
affirm.
We find no clear error in the district court’s
decision to impose the enhancement. United States v. Gordon, 61
F.3d 263, 269 (4th Cir. 1995) (providing standard). The record
reveals that Fuller’s position of being a “personal banker”
clearly aided her crime and provided her with authority beyond
“an ordinary bank teller.” USSG § 3B1.3, comment. (n.1).
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.