Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-1961•Alan O’donnell v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
08-1961Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit08.06.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1961
ALAN O’DONNELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Dennis L. Howell,
Magistrate Judge. (1:07-cv-00195-DLH)
Submitted: May 19, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
V. Lamar Gudger, III, GUDGER & GUDGER, P.A., Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States
Attorney, Washington, D.C., Rami M. Vanegas, Special Assistant
United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alan O’Donnell appeals the order of the magistrate
judge granting summary judgment to the Commissioner in this
action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. O’Donnell v. Astrue, No. 1:07-cv-00195-DLH (W.D.N.C.
June 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.