Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-1879•Thomas W. Hill v. David Richard Hillier
08-1879Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.03.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1879
THOMAS W. HILL,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
DAVID RICHARD HILLIER,
Defendant – Appellee,
MICHAEL T. HILL, Trustee of the Thomas W. Hill Family Trust,
Intervenor - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (1:08-cv-00080-LHT)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas W. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. David Richard Hillier, GUM,
HILLIER & MCCLOSKEY, PA, Asheville, North Carolina; William
Edmund Loose, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas W. Hill appeals the district court’s orders:
(1) dismissing as interlocutory his appeal from the bankruptcy
court’s order enforcing certain terms of a settlement agreement;
(2) denying his motion for recusal; and (3) denying his motion
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Hill v. Hillier, No. 1:08-cv-00080-LHT
(W.D.N.C. June 4, 2008 & July 23, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.