Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-1537•Stanley D. Legum v. Smith Barney, Incorporated
08-1537Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.10.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1537
STANLEY D. LEGUM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SMITH BARNEY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr.,
District Judge. (2:06-cv-00542-WDK-TEM)
Submitted: September 30, 2008 Decided: October 31, 2008
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley D. Legum, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Harrold Sorensen,
GREENBERG & TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stanley D. Legum appeals the district court’s order
confirming an arbitration award against Legum and dismissing
this action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Legum v. Smith Barney, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00542-
WDK-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.