Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-1239•J.d., by his next friends; MARK DAVIS; TAMMY DAVIS v. Kanawha County Board of Education
08-1239Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.12.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1239
J.D., by his next friends; MARK DAVIS; TAMMY DAVIS,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
KANAWHA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,
Chief District Judge. (2:06-cv-00167)
Submitted: December 7, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Davis, Tammy Davis, Appellants Pro Se. Vaughn Sizemore,
BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark and Tammy Davis appeal the district court’s order
entering judgment in favor of the Kanawha County Board of
Education on their claims under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 1400-1482 (West 2000
& Supp. 2009); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006); the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2006); the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-796l
(2006), and the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W. Va. Code Ann.
§§ 5-11-1 to 5-11-21 (LexisNexis 2006 & Supp. 2009). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment.* See Davis v. Kanawha
County Bd. of Educ., No. 2:06-cv-00167 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 11,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* We previously affirmed the portion of the district court’s
judgment granting the Davis’s attorney’s fees. See J.D. ex rel.
Davis v. Kanawha County Bd. of Educ., 571 F.3d 381 (4th Cir.
2009).
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.