Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-1174•Stephanie Angelo v. Richard Thomas
08-1174Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.10.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1174
STEPHANIE ANGELO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD THOMAS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00261-CMH-BRP)
Submitted: October 2, 2008 Decided: October 31, 2008
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. DeVita, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Jennifer Lee
Parrish, PARRISH, HOUCK & SNEAD, PLC, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephanie Angelo appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on her
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and state law claims because it found
Defendant was entitled to qualified immunity. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. See Angelo v. Thomas, No. 1:07-cv-
00261-CMH-BRP (E.D. Va. filed December 18, 2007; entered Dec. 27,
2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.