Dewayne McKenzie v. SHERRIE BAUGH, Solicitor

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6733
DEWAYNE MCKENZIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHERRIE BAUGH, Solicitor; RICK JONES, Public
Defender,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(2:06-cv-00315-RBH)
Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: August 1, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dewayne McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dewayne McKenzie appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
McKenzie’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. McKenzie v. Baugh, No.
2:06-cv-00315-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --