Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-6607•Dexter McPhail v. Rhonda Raynor
07-6607Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.06.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6607
DEXTER MCPHAIL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RHONDA RAYNOR; NORMAN WAYNE NAYLOR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
District Judge. (5:07-ct-03024-D)
Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dexter McPhail, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dexter McPhail appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McPhail v.
Raynor, No. 5:07-ct-03024-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2007). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.