Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-6220•United States of America v. Truman Scott
07-6220Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.08.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6220
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TRUMAN SCOTT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (7:98-cr-00079-F)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Truman Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Truman Scott appeals the district court’s order denying
his “Motion for Disclosure of Grand Jury Material.” We have
reviewed the record and find no clear error in the district court’s
denial. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(E)(ii); In re Grand Jury
Proceedings, 800 F.2d 1293, 1298-99 (4th Cir. 1986) (stating review
standard). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.