Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-6146•Michael A. Webb v. Ms. D. McKnight
07-6146Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.05.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6146
MICHAEL A. WEBB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MS. D. MCKNIGHT; MR. ARMATROD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.
(7:06-cv-00734-gec-mf)
Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 3, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Webb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael Allen Webb appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Webb v. McKnight, No. 7:06-cv-00734-
gec-mf (W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.