Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-4610•Kevin Porter v. George Snyder
07-4610Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.01.2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6426
KEVIN PORTER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
GEORGE SNYDER,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:07-hc-02093-BO)
Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Porter, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Porter v. Snyder, No. 5:07-hc-02093-BO (E.D.N.C.
Mar. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.