Stephen E. Bruns v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-2125
STEPHEN E. BRUNS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:06-cv-01076-JFM)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: January 8, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas James Gagliardo, THE GAGLIARDO LAW FIRM, Silver Spring,
Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States
Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen E. Bruns appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Bruns’ claim
of retaliation, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
Bruns v. Potter, No. 1:06-cv-01076-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 22, 2007).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --