Moe Thompson v. WALTER H. PARHAM, General Counsel, University of South Carolina

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-2095
MOE THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WALTER H. PARHAM, General Counsel, University of South
Carolina; UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:06-cv-02064-CMC)
Submitted: March 27, 2009 Decided: April 17, 2009
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Percy Squire, PERCY SQUIRE CO., LLC, Columbus, Ohio, for
Appellant. Andrew F. Lindemann, William H., Davidson, II,
DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Moe Thompson appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment against him in his civil action
alleging a violation of the Rehabilitation Act. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court from the
bench on October 5, 2007, as noted in the court’s summary
judgment order filed on October 10, 2007. See Thompson v.
Parham, No. 3:06-cv-02064-CMC (D.S.C. Oct. 10, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --