Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-1605•Nkem Egbunike, a/k/a Nkem Anya v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323- 24 1992 . Accordingly, we deny the
07-1605Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.11.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1605
NKEM EGBUNIKE, a/k/a Nkem Anya,
Petitioner,
versus
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A76-590-438)
Submitted: October 24, 2007 Decided: November 16, 2007
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nkem Egbunike, Petitioner Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Stacey
I. Young, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nkem Egbunike, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We
have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Egbunike’s motion.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-
24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Egbunike, No. A76-590-438
(B.I.A. May 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.