Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-1545•United States of America v. Emma D. Handy
07-1545Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.11.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1545
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EMMA D. HANDY,
Claimant - Appellant,
versus
207 SCHOOL HOUSE LANE, GRASONVILLE, MARYLAND
21638, with all buildings, appurtenances, and
improvements thereon; $132,151.37 U.S.
CURRENCY (HANDY),
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:05-cv-
01702-AMD)
Submitted: October 29, 2007 Decided: November 16, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emma D. Handy, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States
Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Richard Charles Kay, Assistant United
States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Emma D. Handy appeals the district court’s order,
following trial, forfeiting certain real property and currency to
the United States. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Handy, Nos. 1:05-cv-01702-
AMD; 1:05-cv-02320-AMD (D. Md. May 8, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.