Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-1517•Gladys Marie Smith v. Wyman-Gordon Apcc Company
07-1517Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.09.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1517
GLADYS MARIE SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WYMAN-GORDON APCC COMPANY; LIBERTY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY; RICHARD E. MCCUE; DAVE
LEWIS; GEOFF HAWKES; JOHN WOODS; DEBRA M.
HARMON; JERRY SAKOOW, United Steelworkers of
America; JANE EDEN, Attorney; ROBERT
HENDERSON; JOE CARLSON, USWA District 4;
WYMAN-GORDON PENSION COMMITTEE; UNITED
STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (4:06-cv-00267-FL)
Submitted: September 11, 2007 Decided: September 13, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gladys Marie Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gladys Marie Smith appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v.
Wyman-Gordon APCC Co., No. 4:06-cv-00267-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23,
2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.