Jerry Dixon v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security

07-1395Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.01.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-2195
JERRY DIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:04-cv-00921-NCT-PTS)
Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: August 6, 2008
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph E. Wolfe, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. Anna Mills
Wagoner, United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina;
Robert J. Triba, Chief Regional Counsel, Christopher A. Michaels,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Dixon appeals the district court’s order adopting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying his motion for
summary judgment and granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary
judgment on his claim for disability insurance benefits and
supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Dixon v. Astrue, No. 1:04-cv-00921-NCT-PTS (M.D.N.C.
Oct. 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.