Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-1266•In re: Patricia Mary Halkas
07-1266Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.06.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1266
In Re: PATRICIA MARY HALKAS,
Debtor.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
PATRICIA MARY HALKAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NANCY L. SPENCER GRIGSBY,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(8:06-cv-02744-DKC; BK-01-23321)
Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 27, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest Paul Francis, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Mary Park
McLean, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Mary Halkas appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order
denying her motion for determination of her right to funds from the
sale of her real property. The district court dismissed the appeal
as moot because the funds had been fully distributed to nonparty
creditors, and, even if Halkas were to prevail on appeal, the
district court would be unable to fashion any effectual relief.
Halkas has noted her appeal to this court, and the trustee in
bankruptcy has moved to dismiss the appeal as moot. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we deny the trustee’s motion to dismiss the appeal, we
summarily affirm the district court’s dismissal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Halkas v. Grigsby, Nos. 8:06-cv-
02744-DKC; BK-01-23321 (D. Md. Feb. 15, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.