Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-1171•Christopher G. Hicks v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
07-1171Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.10.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1171
CHRISTOPHER G. HICKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (1:06-cv-00222)
Submitted: September 19, 2007 Decided: October 10, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George L. Fitzgerald, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Sidney P.
Alexander, Assistant United States Attorney, Dino Trubiano, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Triba, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Christopher G. Hicks appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hicks v. Commissioner, No. 1:06-cv-00222 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24,
2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.