Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-1167•James Williams, Jr v. Prince George’s County Department of Environmental Resources Vehicle Audit Unit
07-1167Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.06.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1167
JAMES WILLIAMS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES VEHICLE AUDIT UNIT;
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LISA MCCOY, Code Enforcement Officer,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(8:06-cv-01936-AW)
Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 20, 2007
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen William Thibodeau,
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Williams, Jr. appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v.
Prince George’s County, No. 8:06-cv-01936-AW (D. Md. dated Jan. 29,
2007; entered Jan. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.