Dante Linton v. United States Marshals Service

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7992
DANTE LINTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; DRUG
ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 07-6106
DANTE LINTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; DRUG
ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:05-cv-02859-RDB)
Submitted: July 31, 2007 Decided: August 15, 2007

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dante Linton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Dante Linton appeals the
district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of
Appellees in this civil action, in which Linton sought the return
of certain property and to set aside an administrative forfeiture.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court
in its orders and at the hearing held on January 11, 2007.
Linton v. U.S. Marshals Serv., No. 1:05-cv-02859-RDB (D. Md.
Oct. 24, 2006; filed Jan. 16, 2007 & entered Jan. 18, 2007). We
grant Linton’s motion to file a supplemental informal brief and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --